There has been a significant development in the IT business sector in recent years and has been a prominent utilization of various new instruments to take the technological space to a new dimension. One of the most perceptible progressions in this field has been that of automation testing. It is an absolute necessity for the advancement of programming development. The advantages of automation testing are remarkable. Zero manual testing, shift-left, and in-sprint automation push organizations to present automation quickly and effectively. Nonetheless, a few normal errors occur while executing automation, and these glitches could affect the expected profit of test automation.
This is the foremost mistake made by most of the development teams—not estimating whether the effort they are putting into automation will yield equal returns or not.
ROI = Total Cost of manual effort saved by automation – [Cost of developing automation + Total Cost of maintaining automation]
This is the primary reason software automation testing projects fall flat or don’t yield the ideal degree of efficiency. The determination of a proper test automation tool is essential. Many elements lead to poor decision-making and tool selection; the most well-known are the following:
Organizations or development teams can avoid the above points by upholding the accurate tool and merchant assessment process. While it is the case that one tool seldom addresses every one of your issues, a definite assessment and choice interaction can guarantee that the majority of your necessities are met.
A usual mistake that happens at the beginning of the process is starting the automation too early. The struggles expected in the redevelopment of automation scripts don’t necessarily, in all cases, justify the advantages. During the phase of the development process, the Quality Assurance (QA) team must spend a proper amount of time preparing detailed manual test scripts for automation. If the test cases have maximum details, you can automate effectively once the feature has been finalized.
Another mistake in automation is trying to run all the given test cases. It can lead to an impractical expenditure of money and time without providing any contributory value to the application. A test case should only be automated when it is wholly tested manually. Automation might not be a viable solution if you have an application whose functionality changes recurrently.
Development teams must consider the accompanying costs before opting for a framework or switching to one. Factors like training and support for developers, tools, and migrating costs impact you and your testers differently.
In general, open-source tools might involve more technical skills and have their limitations, despite the lack of licensing fees. To overcome this, first, get familiar with your problems. The next thing is to compare the tools with the commercial and open-source options that might be suitable for your needs. Eventually, take note of the expenditure related to it. It also depends on your testers and which tool they are opting for based on the skills and training they might need.
Assuming that you might have had a bad experience and faced ordinary outcomes and epic failures with automation in the past, you shouldn’t be afraid or doubtful about trying again. Afterall, it is much worse than any failure or mishap. Take a note of the points mentioned above to keep in mind for future trials. Also, the only way to learn and grow practically is to let mistakes happen.
We presume that automation development is as complex as developing a business application. This is because there are so many errors a testing group can make during the process. Professionals must follow best practices and accurate assets to get the desired results. However, open-source, free tools are also not as technical as we presume them to be.
Given the fact that the main aim of a business or an organization is not to develop automation test frameworks, we cannot deny that it is an important expansion. It will eventually give a superior ROI (Return of investment) to the company. This is also possible by eliminating the overhead charges of creating and maintaining an in-house custom automation system. As far as a smaller organization is concerned, legitimizing ROI in developing an automation system will be tougher as they are less capable of scaling.
Aug 21, 2023
Jul 6, 2023
Apr 28, 2023
© 2017 All rights reserved.